
Vehicle price comparison
Ford Explorer vs Mitsubishi Lancer Transmission prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Mitsubishi Lancer transmission cost more?
A used Mitsubishi Lancer transmission carries a median asking price of $1,900, which is 18% higher than the Ford Explorer at $1,564. Supply also plays a role: Ford Explorer has 3,850 priced listings versus 546 for Mitsubishi Lancer, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
The Ford Explorer average ($1,821) runs 16% above its median ($1,564), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford Explorer (2015–2025) but only 4 for the Mitsubishi Lancer (2015–2018), so the Ford Explorer data reflects a broader range of generations.
Only 64% of Mitsubishi Lancer transmission listings include a posted price (546 of 848 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Ford Explorer is 32% cheaper ($1,400 vs $2,070) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
The Ford Explorer has 7 known trim variants compared to 4 for the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Ford Explorer.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used transmission
- Match the exact transmission ID stamped on the case — the same vehicle can use different units depending on engine, drivetrain, and gear ratio.
- Ask if the transmission was tested before removal. Fluid color matters: red/pink is healthy, brown or burnt-smelling fluid signals internal wear.
- Confirm whether a torque converter (automatic) or clutch kit (manual) is included. Replacing these separately adds $150–$400.
- Check the warranty: reputable yards offer 30–90 days on transmissions. Avoid any with no warranty at all.
Full price guide
Ford Explorer Transmission
$243 – $5,664 · 3,850 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Lancer Transmission
$365 – $4,995 · 546 listings
Common questions
Ford Explorer vs Mitsubishi Lancer transmission FAQ
Is a used Ford Explorer transmission cheaper than a Mitsubishi Lancer?
Ford Explorer has the lower median by $336 (18%). The Ford Explorer transmission ranges from $243 to $5,664 across 3,850 listings, while the Mitsubishi Lancer ranges from $365 to $4,995 across 546 listings.
Can I use a Ford Explorer transmission in a Mitsubishi Lancer?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 3,850 priced Ford Explorer listings and 546 priced Mitsubishi Lancer listings — 4,396 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford Explorer $1,400 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $2,070. Grade B (Good): Ford Explorer $2,365 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $2,540. Grade C (Fair): Ford Explorer $550 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $650. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford Explorer transmission has 7 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Lancer has 4. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons