Vehicle price comparison
Ford F150 vs Buick Regal Front Seat prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ford F150 front seat cost more?
A used Ford F150 front seat carries a median asking price of $186, which is 24% higher than the Buick Regal at $150. Supply also plays a role: Ford F150 has 12,554 priced listings versus 837 for Buick Regal, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 83% of Buick Regal listings compared to 59% for the Ford F150, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Buick Regal side.
The Ford F150 average ($225) runs 21% above its median ($186), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford F150 (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Buick Regal (2015–2020), so the Ford F150 data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Ford F150 front seat is interchangeable across 11 model years versus just 7 for the Buick Regal — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Buick Regal is 20% cheaper ($150 vs $187) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.
The Ford F150 has 23 known trim variants compared to 7 for the Buick Regal, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Ford F150.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used front seat
- Verify seat track floor mounting bolt layouts, which frequently differ between regular cab, extended cab, and SUV body platforms.
- Inspect bottom seat frame wiring connectors to ensure power adjustment, heated/ventilated elements, occupancy sensors, and side airbags match your harness.
- Check leather or fabric upholstery for seam tears, heavy bolster wear, and verify bolster cushion foam hasn't collapsed or degraded.
- Test manual seat recline handles and power track motors to ensure smooth travel across the entire fore-aft and tilt range.
Full price guide
Ford F150 Front Seat
$55 – $833 · 12,554 listings
Full price guide
Buick Regal Front Seat
$50 – $434 · 837 listings
Common questions
Ford F150 vs Buick Regal front seat FAQ
Is a used Ford F150 front seat cheaper than a Buick Regal?
Buick Regal has the lower median by $36 (24%). The Buick Regal front seat ranges from $50 to $434 across 837 listings, while the Ford F150 ranges from $55 to $833 across 12,554 listings.
Can I use a Ford F150 front seat in a Buick Regal?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 12,554 priced Ford F150 listings and 837 priced Buick Regal listings — 13,391 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford F150 $187 vs Buick Regal $150. Grade B (Good): Ford F150 $191 vs Buick Regal $155. Grade C (Fair): Ford F150 $130 vs Buick Regal $100. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford F150 front seat has 23 trim variants and the Buick Regal has 7. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons