Used transmission control module — Ford F150 vs Buick Regal price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Ford F150 vs Buick Regal Transmission Control Module prices

How do used transmission control module prices compare? Buick Regal has the lower median by $56 (56%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Ford F150$156$27 – $81021,086 listings
VS$56difference
Buick Regal$100$17 – $4404,141 listingsLower price

Median price comparison

Ford F150$156
Buick Regal$100
Ford F150MetricBuick Regal
$27Low$17
$156Median$100
$810High$440
21,086Listings4,141

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Ford F150GradeBuick Regal
$16012,976 listings
AExcellent
$1033,090 listings
$1707,570 listings
BGood
$100709 listings
$7562 listings
CFair
$7524 listings

Market analysis

Why does the Ford F150 transmission control module cost more?

A used Ford F150 transmission control module carries a median asking price of $156, which is 56% higher than the Buick Regal at $100. Supply also plays a role: Ford F150 has 21,086 priced listings versus 4,141 for Buick Regal, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

The Buick Regal average ($123) runs 23% above its median ($100), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

Our guide covers 12 model years for the Ford F150 (2015–2026) but only 6 for the Buick Regal (2015–2020), so the Ford F150 data reflects a broader range of generations.

At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Buick Regal is 36% cheaper ($103 vs $160) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used transmission control module

  • Match OEM hardware and software part numbers exactly, as shift schedules and solenoid driving algorithms differ between gear ratios and engine sizes.
  • Determine if the module is standalone, integrated into the PCM/ECM, or mounted internally on the transmission valve body (mechatronic unit).
  • Check if the module requires VIN programming, clutch adaptation relearns, or flash updating before normal gear engagement will occur.
  • Inspect connector pins for fluid wicking; leaky transmission harness seals can force transmission fluid up into the TCM connector plug pins.

Common questions

Ford F150 vs Buick Regal transmission control module FAQ

Is a used Ford F150 transmission control module cheaper than a Buick Regal?

Buick Regal has the lower median by $56 (56%). The Buick Regal transmission control module ranges from $17 to $440 across 4,141 listings, while the Ford F150 ranges from $27 to $810 across 21,086 listings.

Can I use a Ford F150 transmission control module in a Buick Regal?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 21,086 priced Ford F150 listings and 4,141 priced Buick Regal listings — 25,227 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford F150 $160 vs Buick Regal $103. Grade B (Good): Ford F150 $170 vs Buick Regal $100. Grade C (Fair): Ford F150 $75 vs Buick Regal $75. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Ford F150 transmission control module has 30 trim variants and the Buick Regal has 23. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other transmission control module matchups

Ford F150 vs Buick Regal Transmission Control Module — $156 vs $100