Used steering rack — Ford F150 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Ford F150 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Steering Rack prices

How do used steering rack prices compare? Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has the lower median by $309 (206%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Ford F150$459$116 – $1,5517,044 listings
VS$309difference
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport$150$50 – $400369 listingsLower price

Median price comparison

Ford F150$459
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport$150
Ford F150MetricMitsubishi Outlander Sport
$116Low$50
$459Median$150
$1,551High$400
7,044Listings369

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Ford F150GradeMitsubishi Outlander Sport
$4993,872 listings
AExcellent
$162258 listings
$4232,706 listings
BGood
$16670 listings
$25033 listings
CFair
$757 listings

Market analysis

Why does the Ford F150 steering rack cost more?

A used Ford F150 steering rack carries a median asking price of $459, which is 206% higher than the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport at $150. Supply also plays a role: Ford F150 has 7,044 priced listings versus 369 for Mitsubishi Outlander Sport, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 70% of Mitsubishi Outlander Sport listings compared to 55% for the Ford F150, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport side.

Only 67% of Mitsubishi Outlander Sport steering rack listings include a posted price (369 of 550 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.

At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport is 68% cheaper ($162 vs $499) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used steering rack

  • Check for power steering fluid leaks at the input shaft seal and at both inner tie rod boots.
  • Confirm whether it's hydraulic or electric power steering — they're completely different units.
  • Look for a bent housing or damaged mounting ears from collision damage.
  • Ask whether inner tie rods are included. Replacing them separately adds labor and cost.

Common questions

Ford F150 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport steering rack FAQ

Is a used Ford F150 steering rack cheaper than a Mitsubishi Outlander Sport?

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has the lower median by $309 (206%). The Mitsubishi Outlander Sport steering rack ranges from $50 to $400 across 369 listings, while the Ford F150 ranges from $116 to $1,551 across 7,044 listings.

Can I use a Ford F150 steering rack in a Mitsubishi Outlander Sport?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 7,044 priced Ford F150 listings and 369 priced Mitsubishi Outlander Sport listings — 7,413 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford F150 $499 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport $162. Grade B (Good): Ford F150 $423 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport $166. Grade C (Fair): Ford F150 $250 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport $75. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Ford F150 steering rack has 18 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has 0. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other steering rack matchups

Ford F150 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Steering Rack — $459 vs $150