Vehicle price comparison
GMC Sierra 1500 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Window Regulator prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator cost more?
A used GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator carries a median asking price of $150, which is 63% higher than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross at $92. Supply also plays a role: GMC Sierra 1500 has 3,107 priced listings versus 378 for Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross average ($116) runs 26% above its median ($92), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the GMC Sierra 1500 (2015–2025) but only 7 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2018–2025), so the GMC Sierra 1500 data reflects a broader range of generations.
The GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator is interchangeable across 12 model years versus just 7 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 46% cheaper ($83 vs $153) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used window regulator
- Distinguish between power and manual regulators, and confirm motor wire connector pin counts (e.g., 2-pin basic vs 6-pin express auto-up/down with anti-pinch).
- Inspect regulator cables for fraying, rusting, or derailment from plastic pulleys, and check scissor gear teeth for stripping or binding.
- Check glass attachment clips or mounting clamps to ensure plastic snap tabs aren't brittle or broken.
- Verify front door vs rear door and left vs right side specific mounting hole patterns, as regulators are non-interchangeable across doors.
Full price guide
GMC Sierra 1500 Window Regulator
$30 – $410 · 3,107 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Window Regulator
$24 – $321 · 378 listings
Common questions
GMC Sierra 1500 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross window regulator FAQ
Is a used GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator cheaper than a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has the lower median by $58 (63%). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross window regulator ranges from $24 to $321 across 378 listings, while the GMC Sierra 1500 ranges from $30 to $410 across 3,107 listings.
Can I use a GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator in a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 3,107 priced GMC Sierra 1500 listings and 378 priced Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross listings — 3,485 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): GMC Sierra 1500 $153 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $83. Grade B (Good): GMC Sierra 1500 $159 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $115. Grade C (Fair): GMC Sierra 1500 $100 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $75. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator has 8 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons