Used car radio — Mercedes E Class vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Mercedes E Class vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport Car Radio prices

How do used car radio prices compare? Mercedes E Class has the lower median by $82 (32%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Mercedes E Class$175$30 – $1,0359,106 listingsLower price
VS$82difference
Land Rover Range Rover Sport$257$45 – $1,1361,292 listings

Median price comparison

Mercedes E Class$175
Land Rover Range Rover Sport$257
Mercedes E ClassMetricLand Rover Range Rover Sport
$30Low$45
$175Median$257
$1,035High$1,136
9,106Listings1,292

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Mercedes E ClassGradeLand Rover Range Rover Sport
$1867,820 listings
AExcellent
$2501,093 listings
$130608 listings
BGood
$299129 listings
$13036 listings
CFair
—

Market analysis

Why does the Land Rover Range Rover Sport car radio cost more?

A used Land Rover Range Rover Sport car radio carries a median asking price of $257, which is 32% higher than the Mercedes E Class at $175. Supply also plays a role: Mercedes E Class has 9,106 priced listings versus 1,292 for Land Rover Range Rover Sport, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

The Mercedes E Class average ($246) runs 41% above its median ($175), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Mercedes E Class is 26% cheaper ($186 vs $250) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used car radio

  • Verify anti-theft security unlock code availability or whether the unit is anti-theft VIN-locked to the donor vehicle requiring dealer authorization.
  • Match option codes for factory amplified audio systems (e.g., Bose, JBL, Harman Kardon), touchscreens, navigation modules, and steering wheel control interfaces.
  • Inspect the rear connector block for bent pins, cut harness pigtails, or damaged antenna and satellite tuner connections.
  • Ask for confirmation that the touchscreen digitizer, Bluetooth connectivity, and internal disc drive function without freeze-ups or dead zones.

Common questions

Mercedes E Class vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport car radio FAQ

Is a used Mercedes E Class car radio cheaper than a Land Rover Range Rover Sport?

Mercedes E Class has the lower median by $82 (32%). The Mercedes E Class car radio ranges from $30 to $1,035 across 9,106 listings, while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport ranges from $45 to $1,136 across 1,292 listings.

Can I use a Mercedes E Class car radio in a Land Rover Range Rover Sport?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 9,106 priced Mercedes E Class listings and 1,292 priced Land Rover Range Rover Sport listings — 10,398 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Mercedes E Class $186 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport $250. Grade B (Good): Mercedes E Class $130 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport $299. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Mercedes E Class car radio has 2 trim variants and the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other car radio matchups

Mercedes E Class vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport Car Radio — $175 vs $257