Used window regulator — Mercedes E Class vs Mazda 3 price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Mercedes E Class vs Mazda 3 Window Regulator prices

How do used window regulator prices compare? Mercedes E Class has the lower median by $10 (9%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Mercedes E Class$100$30 – $3311,760 listingsLower price
VS$10difference
Mazda 3$110$25 – $280754 listings

Median price comparison

Mercedes E Class$100
Mazda 3$110
Mercedes E ClassMetricMazda 3
$30Low$25
$100Median$110
$331High$280
1,760Listings754

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Mercedes E ClassGradeMazda 3
$1031,444 listings
AExcellent
$110581 listings
$20841 listings
BGood
$147140 listings
$6044 listings
CFair
—

Market analysis

Why does the Mazda 3 window regulator cost more?

A used Mazda 3 window regulator carries a median asking price of $110, which is 9% higher than the Mercedes E Class at $100. Supply also plays a role: Mercedes E Class has 1,760 priced listings versus 754 for Mazda 3, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

The Mercedes E Class average ($123) runs 23% above its median ($100), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

Our guide covers 11 model years for the Mazda 3 (2015–2025) but only 9 for the Mercedes E Class (2015–2024), so the Mazda 3 data reflects a broader range of generations.

Only 52% of Mercedes E Class window regulator listings include a posted price (1,760 of 3,405 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.

At Grade B (good) condition, the Mazda 3 is 29% cheaper ($147 vs $208) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used window regulator

  • Distinguish between power and manual regulators, and confirm motor wire connector pin counts (e.g., 2-pin basic vs 6-pin express auto-up/down with anti-pinch).
  • Inspect regulator cables for fraying, rusting, or derailment from plastic pulleys, and check scissor gear teeth for stripping or binding.
  • Check glass attachment clips or mounting clamps to ensure plastic snap tabs aren't brittle or broken.
  • Verify front door vs rear door and left vs right side specific mounting hole patterns, as regulators are non-interchangeable across doors.

Common questions

Mercedes E Class vs Mazda 3 window regulator FAQ

Is a used Mercedes E Class window regulator cheaper than a Mazda 3?

Mercedes E Class has the lower median by $10 (9%). The Mercedes E Class window regulator ranges from $30 to $331 across 1,760 listings, while the Mazda 3 ranges from $25 to $280 across 754 listings.

Can I use a Mercedes E Class window regulator in a Mazda 3?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 1,760 priced Mercedes E Class listings and 754 priced Mazda 3 listings — 2,514 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Mercedes E Class $103 vs Mazda 3 $110. Grade B (Good): Mercedes E Class $208 vs Mazda 3 $147. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Mercedes E Class window regulator has 2 trim variants and the Mazda 3 has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other window regulator matchups

Mercedes E Class vs Mazda 3 Window Regulator — $100 vs $110