Vehicle price comparison
Ram 1500 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Front Seat prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ram 1500 front seat cost more?
A used Ram 1500 front seat carries a median asking price of $200, which is 14% higher than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross at $175. Supply also plays a role: Ram 1500 has 16,521 priced listings versus 958 for Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
The Ram 1500 average ($230) runs 15% above its median ($200), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ram 1500 (2015–2025) but only 8 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2018–2025), so the Ram 1500 data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Ram 1500 front seat is interchangeable across 14 model years versus just 8 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade B (good) condition, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 31% cheaper ($150 vs $218) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
The Ram 1500 has 33 known trim variants compared to 4 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Ram 1500.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used front seat
- Verify seat track floor mounting bolt layouts, which frequently differ between regular cab, extended cab, and SUV body platforms.
- Inspect bottom seat frame wiring connectors to ensure power adjustment, heated/ventilated elements, occupancy sensors, and side airbags match your harness.
- Check leather or fabric upholstery for seam tears, heavy bolster wear, and verify bolster cushion foam hasn't collapsed or degraded.
- Test manual seat recline handles and power track motors to ensure smooth travel across the entire fore-aft and tilt range.
Full price guide
Ram 1500 Front Seat
$56 – $852 · 16,521 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Front Seat
$65 – $384 · 958 listings
Common questions
Ram 1500 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross front seat FAQ
Is a used Ram 1500 front seat cheaper than a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has the lower median by $25 (14%). The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross front seat ranges from $65 to $384 across 958 listings, while the Ram 1500 ranges from $56 to $852 across 16,521 listings.
Can I use a Ram 1500 front seat in a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 16,521 priced Ram 1500 listings and 958 priced Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross listings — 17,479 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ram 1500 $186 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $195. Grade B (Good): Ram 1500 $218 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $150. Grade C (Fair): Ram 1500 $149 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $146. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ram 1500 front seat has 33 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 4. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons