Used window regulator — Ram 2500 vs Cadillac CTS price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Ram 2500 vs Cadillac CTS Window Regulator prices

How do used window regulator prices compare? Cadillac CTS has the lower median by $85 (105%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Ram 2500$166$28 – $4053,314 listings
VS$85difference
Cadillac CTS$81$40 – $310288 listingsLower price

Median price comparison

Ram 2500$166
Cadillac CTS$81
Ram 2500MetricCadillac CTS
$28Low$40
$166Median$81
$405High$310
3,314Listings288

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Ram 2500GradeCadillac CTS
$1682,282 listings
AExcellent
$90233 listings
$182743 listings
BGood
$8028 listings
$60115 listings
CFair
$751 listings

Market analysis

Why does the Ram 2500 window regulator cost more?

A used Ram 2500 window regulator carries a median asking price of $166, which is 105% higher than the Cadillac CTS at $81. Supply also plays a role: Ram 2500 has 3,314 priced listings versus 288 for Cadillac CTS, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

The Cadillac CTS average ($110) runs 36% above its median ($81), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ram 2500 (2015–2025) but only 5 for the Cadillac CTS (2015–2019), so the Ram 2500 data reflects a broader range of generations.

Only 66% of Cadillac CTS window regulator listings include a posted price (288 of 435 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.

At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Cadillac CTS is 46% cheaper ($90 vs $168) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used window regulator

  • Distinguish between power and manual regulators, and confirm motor wire connector pin counts (e.g., 2-pin basic vs 6-pin express auto-up/down with anti-pinch).
  • Inspect regulator cables for fraying, rusting, or derailment from plastic pulleys, and check scissor gear teeth for stripping or binding.
  • Check glass attachment clips or mounting clamps to ensure plastic snap tabs aren't brittle or broken.
  • Verify front door vs rear door and left vs right side specific mounting hole patterns, as regulators are non-interchangeable across doors.

Common questions

Ram 2500 vs Cadillac CTS window regulator FAQ

Is a used Ram 2500 window regulator cheaper than a Cadillac CTS?

Cadillac CTS has the lower median by $85 (105%). The Cadillac CTS window regulator ranges from $40 to $310 across 288 listings, while the Ram 2500 ranges from $28 to $405 across 3,314 listings.

Can I use a Ram 2500 window regulator in a Cadillac CTS?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 3,314 priced Ram 2500 listings and 288 priced Cadillac CTS listings — 3,602 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ram 2500 $168 vs Cadillac CTS $90. Grade B (Good): Ram 2500 $182 vs Cadillac CTS $80. Grade C (Fair): Ram 2500 $60 vs Cadillac CTS $75. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Ram 2500 window regulator has 8 trim variants and the Cadillac CTS has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other window regulator matchups

Ram 2500 vs Cadillac CTS Window Regulator — $166 vs $81