Vehicle price comparison
Ram 3500 vs Buick Regal Transmission prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ram 3500 transmission cost more?
A used Ram 3500 transmission carries a median asking price of $3,444, which is 430% higher than the Buick Regal at $650. Supply also plays a role: Ram 3500 has 4,911 priced listings versus 758 for Buick Regal, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 85% of Buick Regal listings compared to 49% for the Ram 3500, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Buick Regal side.
The Buick Regal average ($839) runs 29% above its median ($650), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ram 3500 (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Buick Regal (2015–2020), so the Ram 3500 data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Ram 3500 transmission is interchangeable across 22 model years versus just 8 for the Buick Regal — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Buick Regal is 82% cheaper ($640 vs $3,500) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
The Ram 3500 has 5 known trim variants compared to 3 for the Buick Regal, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Ram 3500.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used transmission
- Match the exact transmission ID stamped on the case — the same vehicle can use different units depending on engine, drivetrain, and gear ratio.
- Ask if the transmission was tested before removal. Fluid color matters: red/pink is healthy, brown or burnt-smelling fluid signals internal wear.
- Confirm whether a torque converter (automatic) or clutch kit (manual) is included. Replacing these separately adds $150–$400.
- Check the warranty: reputable yards offer 30–90 days on transmissions. Avoid any with no warranty at all.
Full price guide
Ram 3500 Transmission
$830 – $10,945 · 4,911 listings
Full price guide
Buick Regal Transmission
$125 – $3,709 · 758 listings
Common questions
Ram 3500 vs Buick Regal transmission FAQ
Is a used Ram 3500 transmission cheaper than a Buick Regal?
Buick Regal has the lower median by $2,794 (430%). The Buick Regal transmission ranges from $125 to $3,709 across 758 listings, while the Ram 3500 ranges from $830 to $10,945 across 4,911 listings.
Can I use a Ram 3500 transmission in a Buick Regal?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 4,911 priced Ram 3500 listings and 758 priced Buick Regal listings — 5,669 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ram 3500 $3,500 vs Buick Regal $640. Grade B (Good): Ram 3500 $3,256 vs Buick Regal $429. Grade C (Fair): Ram 3500 $2,850 vs Buick Regal $580. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ram 3500 transmission has 5 trim variants and the Buick Regal has 3. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons