Used starter — Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Starter prices

How do used starter prices compare? Both guides have the same median. Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Dodge Challenger$85$25 – $3901,984 listingsLower price
VS$0difference
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross$85$40 – $299307 listings

Median price comparison

Dodge Challenger$85
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross$85
Dodge ChallengerMetricMitsubishi Eclipse Cross
$25Low$40
$85Median$85
$390High$299
1,984Listings307

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Dodge ChallengerGradeMitsubishi Eclipse Cross
$911,610 listings
AExcellent
$85178 listings
$75127 listings
BGood
$9098 listings
$7315 listings
CFair
$703 listings

Market analysis

Why does the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross starter cost more?

A used Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross starter carries a median asking price of $85, which is 0% higher than the Dodge Challenger at $85. Supply also plays a role: Dodge Challenger has 1,984 priced listings versus 307 for Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 81% of Dodge Challenger listings compared to 58% for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Dodge Challenger side.

The Dodge Challenger average ($111) runs 31% above its median ($85), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

The Dodge Challenger starter is interchangeable across 19 model years versus just 8 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used starter

  • Match the bolt pattern and nose cone length — starters from the same engine family may physically bolt up but not engage the flywheel correctly.
  • Check the solenoid for corrosion on the electrical terminals.
  • Ask whether it was bench-tested. A starter should crank firmly without excessive draw.
  • Verify the tooth count on the drive gear matches your flywheel or flexplate.

Common questions

Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross starter FAQ

Is a used Dodge Challenger starter cheaper than a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?

Both guides have the same median. The Dodge Challenger starter ranges from $25 to $390 across 1,984 listings, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ranges from $40 to $299 across 307 listings.

Can I use a Dodge Challenger starter in a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 1,984 priced Dodge Challenger listings and 307 priced Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross listings — 2,291 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Dodge Challenger $91 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $85. Grade B (Good): Dodge Challenger $75 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $90. Grade C (Fair): Dodge Challenger $73 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $70. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Dodge Challenger starter has 6 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other starter matchups

Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Starter — $85 vs $85