Used starter — Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Starter prices

How do used starter prices compare? Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has the lower median by $10 (13%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Dodge Challenger$85$25 – $3901,984 listings
VS$10difference
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport$75$25 – $290346 listingsLower price

Median price comparison

Dodge Challenger$85
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport$75
Dodge ChallengerMetricMitsubishi Outlander Sport
$25Low$25
$85Median$75
$390High$290
1,984Listings346

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Dodge ChallengerGradeMitsubishi Outlander Sport
$911,610 listings
AExcellent
$75242 listings
$75127 listings
BGood
$11067 listings
$7315 listings
CFair
$501 listings

Market analysis

Why does the Dodge Challenger starter cost more?

A used Dodge Challenger starter carries a median asking price of $85, which is 13% higher than the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport at $75. Supply also plays a role: Dodge Challenger has 1,984 priced listings versus 346 for Mitsubishi Outlander Sport, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

The Dodge Challenger average ($111) runs 31% above its median ($85), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

The Dodge Challenger starter is interchangeable across 19 model years versus just 15 for the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.

At Grade B (good) condition, the Dodge Challenger is 32% cheaper ($75 vs $110) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used starter

  • Match the bolt pattern and nose cone length — starters from the same engine family may physically bolt up but not engage the flywheel correctly.
  • Check the solenoid for corrosion on the electrical terminals.
  • Ask whether it was bench-tested. A starter should crank firmly without excessive draw.
  • Verify the tooth count on the drive gear matches your flywheel or flexplate.

Common questions

Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport starter FAQ

Is a used Dodge Challenger starter cheaper than a Mitsubishi Outlander Sport?

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has the lower median by $10 (13%). The Mitsubishi Outlander Sport starter ranges from $25 to $290 across 346 listings, while the Dodge Challenger ranges from $25 to $390 across 1,984 listings.

Can I use a Dodge Challenger starter in a Mitsubishi Outlander Sport?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 1,984 priced Dodge Challenger listings and 346 priced Mitsubishi Outlander Sport listings — 2,330 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Dodge Challenger $91 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport $75. Grade B (Good): Dodge Challenger $75 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport $110. Grade C (Fair): Dodge Challenger $73 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport $50. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Dodge Challenger starter has 6 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has 0. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other starter matchups

Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Starter — $85 vs $75