Vehicle price comparison
Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Outlander Exhaust Manifold prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Mitsubishi Outlander exhaust manifold cost more?
A used Mitsubishi Outlander exhaust manifold carries a median asking price of $225, which is 36% higher than the Dodge Challenger at $144. Supply also plays a role: Dodge Challenger has 1,615 priced listings versus 39 for Mitsubishi Outlander, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 85% of Mitsubishi Outlander listings compared to 67% for the Dodge Challenger, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Mitsubishi Outlander side.
The Dodge Challenger average ($183) runs 27% above its median ($144), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Only 66% of Dodge Challenger exhaust manifold listings include a posted price (1,615 of 2,459 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
The Dodge Challenger exhaust manifold is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 9 for the Mitsubishi Outlander — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Dodge Challenger is 33% cheaper ($150 vs $225) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used exhaust manifold
- Inspect the casting or tubular welds thoroughly for hairline thermal cracks, especially around collector junctions and bolt holes.
- Check mounting flanges with a straight edge for warping, which causes persistent exhaust leaks even with new gaskets installed.
- Verify oxygen sensor port count, thread condition, and EGR valve port locations, which differ depending on regional emissions equipment.
- Check that cylinder head exhaust port shapes (round vs D-port vs oval) match your engine's cylinder head design.
Full price guide
Dodge Challenger Exhaust Manifold
$35 – $743 · 1,615 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Outlander Exhaust Manifold
$200 – $300 · 39 listings
Common questions
Dodge Challenger vs Mitsubishi Outlander exhaust manifold FAQ
Is a used Dodge Challenger exhaust manifold cheaper than a Mitsubishi Outlander?
Dodge Challenger has the lower median by $81 (36%). The Dodge Challenger exhaust manifold ranges from $35 to $743 across 1,615 listings, while the Mitsubishi Outlander ranges from $200 to $300 across 39 listings.
Can I use a Dodge Challenger exhaust manifold in a Mitsubishi Outlander?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 1,615 priced Dodge Challenger listings and 39 priced Mitsubishi Outlander listings — 1,654 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Dodge Challenger $150 vs Mitsubishi Outlander $225. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Dodge Challenger exhaust manifold has 6 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Outlander has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons