Vehicle price comparison
Dodge Charger vs Volvo XC40 Control Arm prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Volvo XC40 control arm cost more?
A used Volvo XC40 control arm carries a median asking price of $139, which is 46% higher than the Dodge Charger at $75. Supply also plays a role: Dodge Charger has 5,872 priced listings versus 423 for Volvo XC40, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 88% of Volvo XC40 listings compared to 71% for the Dodge Charger, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Volvo XC40 side.
The Dodge Charger average ($105) runs 40% above its median ($75), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 9 model years for the Dodge Charger (2015–2023) but only 7 for the Volvo XC40 (2019–2025), so the Dodge Charger data reflects a broader range of generations.
Only 60% of Dodge Charger control arm listings include a posted price (5,872 of 9,785 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
The Dodge Charger control arm is interchangeable across 13 model years versus just 7 for the Volvo XC40 — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Dodge Charger is 47% cheaper ($75 vs $141) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used control arm
- Inspect the arm for subtle bends, hairline cracks, or deep rust scale, comparing geometry carefully against your original unit.
- Examine the rubber bushings for dry rot, tearing, or separation from the metal casing, as worn bushings require pressing out before installation.
- Check integrated ball joints for boot tears and axial play; if non-replaceable, factor in the cost of a unit with a fresh ball joint.
- Verify material type (cast iron, stamped steel, or aluminum) and sway bar link mounting location, which can vary across sub-models and suspension packages.
Full price guide
Dodge Charger Control Arm
$20 – $436 · 5,872 listings
Full price guide
Volvo XC40 Control Arm
$45 – $345 · 423 listings
Common questions
Dodge Charger vs Volvo XC40 control arm FAQ
Is a used Dodge Charger control arm cheaper than a Volvo XC40?
Dodge Charger has the lower median by $64 (46%). The Dodge Charger control arm ranges from $20 to $436 across 5,872 listings, while the Volvo XC40 ranges from $45 to $345 across 423 listings.
Can I use a Dodge Charger control arm in a Volvo XC40?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 5,872 priced Dodge Charger listings and 423 priced Volvo XC40 listings — 6,295 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Dodge Charger $75 vs Volvo XC40 $141. Grade B (Good): Dodge Charger $75 vs Volvo XC40 $146. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Dodge Charger control arm has 25 trim variants and the Volvo XC40 has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons