Vehicle price comparison
Ford Explorer vs Mitsubishi Lancer Strut prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ford Explorer strut cost more?
A used Ford Explorer strut carries a median asking price of $120, which is 118% higher than the Mitsubishi Lancer at $55. Supply also plays a role: Ford Explorer has 5,089 priced listings versus 736 for Mitsubishi Lancer, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
The Ford Explorer average ($144) runs 20% above its median ($120), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford Explorer (2015–2025) but only 3 for the Mitsubishi Lancer (2015–2017), so the Ford Explorer data reflects a broader range of generations.
Only 57% of Mitsubishi Lancer strut listings include a posted price (736 of 1,288 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
The Ford Explorer strut is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 10 for the Mitsubishi Lancer — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Mitsubishi Lancer is 52% cheaper ($60 vs $125) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
The Ford Explorer has 12 known trim variants compared to 4 for the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Ford Explorer.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used strut
- Check the shaft for pitting or rust — a pitted shaft will chew through the new seal and start leaking immediately.
- Look for oil weeping around the seal area. A light film is normal on older units; dripping means it's spent.
- Confirm whether the strut mount and spring are included, or if you'll need to transfer yours over.
- Match the part to your vehicle's suspension type (standard, sport, electronic/adaptive) — they're not interchangeable.
Full price guide
Ford Explorer Strut
$22 – $440 · 5,089 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Lancer Strut
$30 – $151 · 736 listings
Common questions
Ford Explorer vs Mitsubishi Lancer strut FAQ
Is a used Ford Explorer strut cheaper than a Mitsubishi Lancer?
Mitsubishi Lancer has the lower median by $65 (118%). The Mitsubishi Lancer strut ranges from $30 to $151 across 736 listings, while the Ford Explorer ranges from $22 to $440 across 5,089 listings.
Can I use a Ford Explorer strut in a Mitsubishi Lancer?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 5,089 priced Ford Explorer listings and 736 priced Mitsubishi Lancer listings — 5,825 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford Explorer $125 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $60. Grade B (Good): Ford Explorer $125 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $75. Grade C (Fair): Ford Explorer $85 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $75. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford Explorer strut has 12 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Lancer has 4. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons