Vehicle price comparison
Ford Explorer vs Volvo XC90 Intake Manifold prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Volvo XC90 intake manifold cost more?
A used Volvo XC90 intake manifold carries a median asking price of $114, which is 29% higher than the Ford Explorer at $81. Supply also plays a role: Ford Explorer has 1,563 priced listings versus 412 for Volvo XC90, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 81% of Volvo XC90 listings compared to 57% for the Ford Explorer, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Volvo XC90 side.
The Ford Explorer average ($108) runs 33% above its median ($81), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford Explorer (2015–2025) but only 9 for the Volvo XC90 (2016–2024), so the Ford Explorer data reflects a broader range of generations.
Only 68% of Ford Explorer intake manifold listings include a posted price (1,563 of 2,290 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
The Ford Explorer intake manifold is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 10 for the Volvo XC90 — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Ford Explorer is 26% cheaper ($86 vs $116) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used intake manifold
- Inspect composite or metal manifolds for hairline heat cracks, blown runner gaskets, or oil soaking inside the plenum from bad PCV systems.
- Verify throttle body flange bolt pattern, MAP sensor mounting port, and vacuum port locations across model years and engine generations.
- Check variable intake runner flaps (IMTV or DISA valves) and actuator vacuum bladders or electric motors for proper movement without binding.
- Examine head mounting flanges for warping or deep gouges that prevent a vacuum-tight seal against the intake gaskets.
Full price guide
Ford Explorer Intake Manifold
$27 – $350 · 1,563 listings
Full price guide
Volvo XC90 Intake Manifold
$65 – $265 · 412 listings
Common questions
Ford Explorer vs Volvo XC90 intake manifold FAQ
Is a used Ford Explorer intake manifold cheaper than a Volvo XC90?
Ford Explorer has the lower median by $33 (29%). The Ford Explorer intake manifold ranges from $27 to $350 across 1,563 listings, while the Volvo XC90 ranges from $65 to $265 across 412 listings.
Can I use a Ford Explorer intake manifold in a Volvo XC90?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 1,563 priced Ford Explorer listings and 412 priced Volvo XC90 listings — 1,975 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford Explorer $86 vs Volvo XC90 $116. Grade B (Good): Ford Explorer $100 vs Volvo XC90 $116. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford Explorer intake manifold has 4 trim variants and the Volvo XC90 has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons