Vehicle price comparison
Ford F150 vs Land Rover Range Rover Transmission Control Module prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ford F150 transmission control module cost more?
A used Ford F150 transmission control module carries a median asking price of $156, which is 47% higher than the Land Rover Range Rover at $106. Supply also plays a role: Ford F150 has 21,086 priced listings versus 4,428 for Land Rover Range Rover, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 85% of Land Rover Range Rover listings compared to 62% for the Ford F150, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Land Rover Range Rover side.
The Land Rover Range Rover average ($129) runs 22% above its median ($106), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
The Ford F150 transmission control module is interchangeable across 20 model years versus just 13 for the Land Rover Range Rover — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Land Rover Range Rover is 31% cheaper ($111 vs $160) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used transmission control module
- Match OEM hardware and software part numbers exactly, as shift schedules and solenoid driving algorithms differ between gear ratios and engine sizes.
- Determine if the module is standalone, integrated into the PCM/ECM, or mounted internally on the transmission valve body (mechatronic unit).
- Check if the module requires VIN programming, clutch adaptation relearns, or flash updating before normal gear engagement will occur.
- Inspect connector pins for fluid wicking; leaky transmission harness seals can force transmission fluid up into the TCM connector plug pins.
Full price guide
Ford F150 Transmission Control Module
$27 – $810 · 21,086 listings
Full price guide
Land Rover Range Rover Transmission Control Module
$30 – $565 · 4,428 listings
Common questions
Ford F150 vs Land Rover Range Rover transmission control module FAQ
Is a used Ford F150 transmission control module cheaper than a Land Rover Range Rover?
Land Rover Range Rover has the lower median by $50 (47%). The Land Rover Range Rover transmission control module ranges from $30 to $565 across 4,428 listings, while the Ford F150 ranges from $27 to $810 across 21,086 listings.
Can I use a Ford F150 transmission control module in a Land Rover Range Rover?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 21,086 priced Ford F150 listings and 4,428 priced Land Rover Range Rover listings — 25,514 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford F150 $160 vs Land Rover Range Rover $111. Grade B (Good): Ford F150 $170 vs Land Rover Range Rover $118. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford F150 transmission control module has 30 trim variants and the Land Rover Range Rover has 1. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons