Vehicle price comparison
Ford F250 vs Cadillac CT5 Drive Shaft prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ford F250 drive shaft cost more?
A used Ford F250 drive shaft carries a median asking price of $285, which is 26% higher than the Cadillac CT5 at $227. Supply also plays a role: Ford F250 has 9,763 priced listings versus 1,158 for Cadillac CT5, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 86% of Cadillac CT5 listings compared to 59% for the Ford F250, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Cadillac CT5 side.
The Ford F250 average ($328) runs 15% above its median ($285), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 10 model years for the Ford F250 (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Cadillac CT5 (2020–2025), so the Ford F250 data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Ford F250 drive shaft is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 7 for the Cadillac CT5 — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Cadillac CT5 is 21% cheaper ($240 vs $305) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.
The Ford F250 has 34 known trim variants compared to 5 for the Cadillac CT5, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Ford F250.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used drive shaft
- Measure exact overall length from u-joint center to center, as wheelbase, transmission options, and cab or bed configurations change shaft dimensions dramatically.
- Inspect slip yoke splines for twisting, excessive wear, or rust pitting, and check universal joint journals for binding or rough movement.
- Check the tubular shaft body for denting, scraping, or missing balance weights, which cause severe driveline vibration at high speeds.
- Verify carrier bearing cushion condition on two-piece drive shafts and confirm flange bolt pattern alignment at the differential yoke.
Full price guide
Ford F250 Drive Shaft
$80 – $1,041 · 9,763 listings
Full price guide
Cadillac CT5 Drive Shaft
$75 – $618 · 1,158 listings
Common questions
Ford F250 vs Cadillac CT5 drive shaft FAQ
Is a used Ford F250 drive shaft cheaper than a Cadillac CT5?
Cadillac CT5 has the lower median by $58 (26%). The Cadillac CT5 drive shaft ranges from $75 to $618 across 1,158 listings, while the Ford F250 ranges from $80 to $1,041 across 9,763 listings.
Can I use a Ford F250 drive shaft in a Cadillac CT5?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 9,763 priced Ford F250 listings and 1,158 priced Cadillac CT5 listings — 10,921 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford F250 $305 vs Cadillac CT5 $240. Grade B (Good): Ford F250 $268 vs Cadillac CT5 $141. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford F250 drive shaft has 34 trim variants and the Cadillac CT5 has 5. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons