Vehicle price comparison
Ford F250 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Heater Core prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Mitsubishi Lancer heater core cost more?
A used Mitsubishi Lancer heater core carries a median asking price of $266, which is 66% higher than the Ford F250 at $91. Supply also plays a role: Ford F250 has 1,240 priced listings versus 87 for Mitsubishi Lancer, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 98% of Mitsubishi Lancer listings compared to 67% for the Ford F250, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Mitsubishi Lancer side.
The Ford F250 average ($164) runs 80% above its median ($91), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 10 model years for the Ford F250 (2015–2025) but only 3 for the Mitsubishi Lancer (2015–2017), so the Ford F250 data reflects a broader range of generations.
Only 58% of Mitsubishi Lancer heater core listings include a posted price (87 of 150 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
The Ford F250 heater core is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 11 for the Mitsubishi Lancer — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Ford F250 is 66% cheaper ($91 vs $266) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used heater core
- Pressure test the core before installation to check for pinhole leaks, as dashboard removal labor makes installing a leaking used core costly.
- Inspect inlet and outlet aluminum tubes for crimping, bending, or galvanic corrosion where hoses clamp on.
- Look into the tube openings for white mineral deposits or rust scale, which indicate neglected cooling systems and clogged internal passages.
- Verify tube routing angles and quick-disconnect collar designs to ensure proper clearance through the firewall box.
Full price guide
Ford F250 Heater Core
$40 – $450 · 1,240 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Lancer Heater Core
$266 – $266 · 87 listings
Common questions
Ford F250 vs Mitsubishi Lancer heater core FAQ
Is a used Ford F250 heater core cheaper than a Mitsubishi Lancer?
Ford F250 has the lower median by $175 (66%). The Ford F250 heater core ranges from $40 to $450 across 1,240 listings, while the Mitsubishi Lancer ranges from $266 to $266 across 87 listings.
Can I use a Ford F250 heater core in a Mitsubishi Lancer?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 1,240 priced Ford F250 listings and 87 priced Mitsubishi Lancer listings — 1,327 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford F250 $91 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $266. Grade B (Good): Ford F250 $91 vs Mitsubishi Lancer $266. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford F250 heater core has 3 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Lancer has 0. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons