Vehicle price comparison
Ford Mustang vs Chevy Impala Control Arm prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Ford Mustang control arm cost more?
A used Ford Mustang control arm carries a median asking price of $75, which is 50% higher than the Chevy Impala at $50. Supply also plays a role: Ford Mustang has 6,555 priced listings versus 141 for Chevy Impala, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 90% of Ford Mustang listings compared to 38% for the Chevy Impala, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Ford Mustang side.
The Ford Mustang average ($115) runs 53% above its median ($75), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford Mustang (2015–2025) but only 3 for the Chevy Impala (2017–2019), so the Ford Mustang data reflects a broader range of generations.
Only 47% of Chevy Impala control arm listings include a posted price (141 of 300 observed) — the rest are "call for price," which usually signals negotiable or higher-than-average pricing.
The Ford Mustang control arm is interchangeable across 11 model years versus just 7 for the Chevy Impala — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Chevy Impala is 44% cheaper ($50 vs $90) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used control arm
- Inspect the arm for subtle bends, hairline cracks, or deep rust scale, comparing geometry carefully against your original unit.
- Examine the rubber bushings for dry rot, tearing, or separation from the metal casing, as worn bushings require pressing out before installation.
- Check integrated ball joints for boot tears and axial play; if non-replaceable, factor in the cost of a unit with a fresh ball joint.
- Verify material type (cast iron, stamped steel, or aluminum) and sway bar link mounting location, which can vary across sub-models and suspension packages.
Full price guide
Ford Mustang Control Arm
$25 – $400 · 6,555 listings
Full price guide
Chevy Impala Control Arm
$40 – $139 · 141 listings
Common questions
Ford Mustang vs Chevy Impala control arm FAQ
Is a used Ford Mustang control arm cheaper than a Chevy Impala?
Chevy Impala has the lower median by $25 (50%). The Chevy Impala control arm ranges from $40 to $139 across 141 listings, while the Ford Mustang ranges from $25 to $400 across 6,555 listings.
Can I use a Ford Mustang control arm in a Chevy Impala?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 6,555 priced Ford Mustang listings and 141 priced Chevy Impala listings — 6,696 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford Mustang $90 vs Chevy Impala $50. Grade B (Good): Ford Mustang $75 vs Chevy Impala $65. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford Mustang control arm has 2 trim variants and the Chevy Impala has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons