
Vehicle price comparison
Ford Mustang vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Control Arm prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross control arm cost more?
A used Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross control arm carries a median asking price of $99, which is 24% higher than the Ford Mustang at $75. Supply also plays a role: Ford Mustang has 6,555 priced listings versus 549 for Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 90% of Ford Mustang listings compared to 52% for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Ford Mustang side.
The Ford Mustang average ($115) runs 53% above its median ($75), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford Mustang (2015–2025) but only 7 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2018–2025), so the Ford Mustang data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Ford Mustang control arm is interchangeable across 11 model years versus just 7 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade B (good) condition, the Ford Mustang is 34% cheaper ($75 vs $114) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used control arm
- Inspect the arm for subtle bends, hairline cracks, or deep rust scale, comparing geometry carefully against your original unit.
- Examine the rubber bushings for dry rot, tearing, or separation from the metal casing, as worn bushings require pressing out before installation.
- Check integrated ball joints for boot tears and axial play; if non-replaceable, factor in the cost of a unit with a fresh ball joint.
- Verify material type (cast iron, stamped steel, or aluminum) and sway bar link mounting location, which can vary across sub-models and suspension packages.
Full price guide
Ford Mustang Control Arm
$25 – $400 · 6,555 listings
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Control Arm
$40 – $327 · 549 listings
Common questions
Ford Mustang vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross control arm FAQ
Is a used Ford Mustang control arm cheaper than a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
Ford Mustang has the lower median by $24 (24%). The Ford Mustang control arm ranges from $25 to $400 across 6,555 listings, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ranges from $40 to $327 across 549 listings.
Can I use a Ford Mustang control arm in a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 6,555 priced Ford Mustang listings and 549 priced Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross listings — 7,104 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ford Mustang $90 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $90. Grade B (Good): Ford Mustang $75 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $114. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Ford Mustang control arm has 2 trim variants and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons