Used window regulator — GMC Sierra 1500 vs Lincoln Aviator price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

GMC Sierra 1500 vs Lincoln Aviator Window Regulator prices

How do used window regulator prices compare? GMC Sierra 1500 has the lower median by $35 (19%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

GMC Sierra 1500$150$30 – $4103,107 listingsLower price
VS$35difference
Lincoln Aviator$185$40 – $366158 listings

Median price comparison

GMC Sierra 1500$150
Lincoln Aviator$185
GMC Sierra 1500MetricLincoln Aviator
$30Low$40
$150Median$185
$410High$366
3,107Listings158

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

GMC Sierra 1500GradeLincoln Aviator
$1531,731 listings
AExcellent
$13778 listings
$1591,216 listings
BGood
$23072 listings
$1009 listings
CFair
—

Market analysis

Why does the Lincoln Aviator window regulator cost more?

A used Lincoln Aviator window regulator carries a median asking price of $185, which is 19% higher than the GMC Sierra 1500 at $150. Supply also plays a role: GMC Sierra 1500 has 3,107 priced listings versus 158 for Lincoln Aviator, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

Our guide covers 11 model years for the GMC Sierra 1500 (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Lincoln Aviator (2020–2025), so the GMC Sierra 1500 data reflects a broader range of generations.

The GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator is interchangeable across 12 model years versus just 4 for the Lincoln Aviator — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.

At Grade B (good) condition, the GMC Sierra 1500 is 31% cheaper ($159 vs $230) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used window regulator

  • Distinguish between power and manual regulators, and confirm motor wire connector pin counts (e.g., 2-pin basic vs 6-pin express auto-up/down with anti-pinch).
  • Inspect regulator cables for fraying, rusting, or derailment from plastic pulleys, and check scissor gear teeth for stripping or binding.
  • Check glass attachment clips or mounting clamps to ensure plastic snap tabs aren't brittle or broken.
  • Verify front door vs rear door and left vs right side specific mounting hole patterns, as regulators are non-interchangeable across doors.

Common questions

GMC Sierra 1500 vs Lincoln Aviator window regulator FAQ

Is a used GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator cheaper than a Lincoln Aviator?

GMC Sierra 1500 has the lower median by $35 (19%). The GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator ranges from $30 to $410 across 3,107 listings, while the Lincoln Aviator ranges from $40 to $366 across 158 listings.

Can I use a GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator in a Lincoln Aviator?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 3,107 priced GMC Sierra 1500 listings and 158 priced Lincoln Aviator listings — 3,265 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): GMC Sierra 1500 $153 vs Lincoln Aviator $137. Grade B (Good): GMC Sierra 1500 $159 vs Lincoln Aviator $230. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The GMC Sierra 1500 window regulator has 8 trim variants and the Lincoln Aviator has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other window regulator matchups

GMC Sierra 1500 vs Lincoln Aviator Window Regulator — $150 vs $185