
Vehicle price comparison
GMC Sierra 1500 vs Subaru Ascent Fuel Tank prices
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Market analysis
Why does the GMC Sierra 1500 fuel tank cost more?
A used GMC Sierra 1500 fuel tank carries a median asking price of $197, which is 52% higher than the Subaru Ascent at $130. Supply also plays a role: GMC Sierra 1500 has 2,699 priced listings versus 49 for Subaru Ascent, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Our guide covers 9 model years for the GMC Sierra 1500 (2016–2025) but only 1 for the Subaru Ascent (2023–2023), so the GMC Sierra 1500 data reflects a broader range of generations.
The GMC Sierra 1500 fuel tank is interchangeable across 23 model years versus just 6 for the Subaru Ascent — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
Full price guide
GMC Sierra 1500 Fuel Tank
$25 – $943 · 2,699 listings
Full price guide
Subaru Ascent Fuel Tank
$87 – $355 · 49 listings
Common questions
GMC Sierra 1500 vs Subaru Ascent fuel tank FAQ
Is a used GMC Sierra 1500 fuel tank cheaper than a Subaru Ascent?
Subaru Ascent has the lower median by $67 (52%). The Subaru Ascent fuel tank ranges from $87 to $355 across 49 listings, while the GMC Sierra 1500 ranges from $25 to $943 across 2,699 listings.
Can I use a GMC Sierra 1500 fuel tank in a Subaru Ascent?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 2,699 priced GMC Sierra 1500 listings and 49 priced Subaru Ascent listings — 2,748 in total.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The GMC Sierra 1500 fuel tank has 2 trim variants and the Subaru Ascent has 0. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons