Vehicle price comparison
Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Honda Fit Axle Shaft prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Jeep Grand Cherokee axle shaft cost more?
A used Jeep Grand Cherokee axle shaft carries a median asking price of $151, which is 51% higher than the Honda Fit at $100. Supply also plays a role: Jeep Grand Cherokee has 7,558 priced listings versus 1,300 for Honda Fit, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 92% of Honda Fit listings compared to 74% for the Jeep Grand Cherokee, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Honda Fit side.
The Honda Fit average ($116) runs 16% above its median ($100), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Jeep Grand Cherokee (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Honda Fit (2015–2020), so the Jeep Grand Cherokee data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee axle shaft is interchangeable across 16 model years versus just 6 for the Honda Fit — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Honda Fit is 24% cheaper ($116 vs $152) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has 17 known trim variants compared to 4 for the Honda Fit, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used axle shaft
- Inspect the CV joint boots for cracks or tears. A torn boot means contaminated grease and likely a worn joint.
- Check the splines on both ends for wear, rounding, or corrosion.
- Match the axle length and spline count exactly. AWD and FWD variants of the same vehicle often use different axles.
- Confirm the ABS tone ring is present and undamaged — a missing ring triggers ABS warning lights.
Full price guide
Jeep Grand Cherokee Axle Shaft
$35 – $609 · 7,558 listings
Full price guide
Honda Fit Axle Shaft
$35 – $254 · 1,300 listings
Common questions
Jeep Grand Cherokee vs Honda Fit axle shaft FAQ
Is a used Jeep Grand Cherokee axle shaft cheaper than a Honda Fit?
Honda Fit has the lower median by $51 (51%). The Honda Fit axle shaft ranges from $35 to $254 across 1,300 listings, while the Jeep Grand Cherokee ranges from $35 to $609 across 7,558 listings.
Can I use a Jeep Grand Cherokee axle shaft in a Honda Fit?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 7,558 priced Jeep Grand Cherokee listings and 1,300 priced Honda Fit listings — 8,858 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Jeep Grand Cherokee $152 vs Honda Fit $116. Grade B (Good): Jeep Grand Cherokee $165 vs Honda Fit $85. Grade C (Fair): Jeep Grand Cherokee $85 vs Honda Fit $65. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Jeep Grand Cherokee axle shaft has 17 trim variants and the Honda Fit has 4. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons