Used axle shaft — Mercedes C Class vs Lincoln Aviator price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Mercedes C Class vs Lincoln Aviator Axle Shaft prices

How do used axle shaft prices compare? Lincoln Aviator has the lower median by $36 (22%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Mercedes C Class$202$40 – $8529,345 listings
VS$36difference
Lincoln Aviator$166$50 – $400920 listingsLower price

Median price comparison

Mercedes C Class$202
Lincoln Aviator$166
Mercedes C ClassMetricLincoln Aviator
$40Low$50
$202Median$166
$852High$400
9,345Listings920

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Mercedes C ClassGradeLincoln Aviator
$2118,397 listings
AExcellent
$169447 listings
$150468 listings
BGood
$155323 listings
$7523 listings
CFair
—

Market analysis

Why does the Mercedes C Class axle shaft cost more?

A used Mercedes C Class axle shaft carries a median asking price of $202, which is 22% higher than the Lincoln Aviator at $166. Supply also plays a role: Mercedes C Class has 9,345 priced listings versus 920 for Lincoln Aviator, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 90% of Mercedes C Class listings compared to 49% for the Lincoln Aviator, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Mercedes C Class side.

Our guide covers 10 model years for the Mercedes C Class (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Lincoln Aviator (2020–2025), so the Mercedes C Class data reflects a broader range of generations.

The Mercedes C Class axle shaft is interchangeable across 19 model years versus just 6 for the Lincoln Aviator — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.

At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Lincoln Aviator is 20% cheaper ($169 vs $211) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used axle shaft

  • Inspect the CV joint boots for cracks or tears. A torn boot means contaminated grease and likely a worn joint.
  • Check the splines on both ends for wear, rounding, or corrosion.
  • Match the axle length and spline count exactly. AWD and FWD variants of the same vehicle often use different axles.
  • Confirm the ABS tone ring is present and undamaged — a missing ring triggers ABS warning lights.

Common questions

Mercedes C Class vs Lincoln Aviator axle shaft FAQ

Is a used Mercedes C Class axle shaft cheaper than a Lincoln Aviator?

Lincoln Aviator has the lower median by $36 (22%). The Lincoln Aviator axle shaft ranges from $50 to $400 across 920 listings, while the Mercedes C Class ranges from $40 to $852 across 9,345 listings.

Can I use a Mercedes C Class axle shaft in a Lincoln Aviator?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 9,345 priced Mercedes C Class listings and 920 priced Lincoln Aviator listings — 10,265 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Mercedes C Class $211 vs Lincoln Aviator $169. Grade B (Good): Mercedes C Class $150 vs Lincoln Aviator $155. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Mercedes C Class axle shaft has 2 trim variants and the Lincoln Aviator has 4. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other axle shaft matchups

Mercedes C Class vs Lincoln Aviator Axle Shaft — $202 vs $166