Vehicle price comparison
Mercedes E Class vs Chrysler Voyager Fuel Pump prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Chrysler Voyager fuel pump cost more?
A used Chrysler Voyager fuel pump carries a median asking price of $161, which is 22% higher than the Mercedes E Class at $125. Supply also plays a role: Mercedes E Class has 5,164 priced listings versus 234 for Chrysler Voyager, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 77% of Mercedes E Class listings compared to 46% for the Chrysler Voyager, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Mercedes E Class side.
The Chrysler Voyager average ($139) falls below its median ($161), suggesting a cluster of deeply discounted units — often high-mileage or incomplete assemblies.
Our guide covers 10 model years for the Mercedes E Class (2015–2024) but only 5 for the Chrysler Voyager (2020–2025), so the Mercedes E Class data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Mercedes E Class fuel pump is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 9 for the Chrysler Voyager — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Mercedes E Class is 23% cheaper ($125 vs $163) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used fuel pump
- Match pump assembly module numbers, tank lock ring style, and quick-connect fuel line fitting diameters and counts (feed, return, and vapor lines).
- Check electrical connector pins for signs of heat scorching or melting, which indicates high current draw from an overheating motor.
- Inspect fuel level sender float arm and resistor wiper board for wear or corrosion that causes inaccurate gas gauge readings.
- Confirm whether the donor vehicle ran on standard gasoline, flex-fuel (E85), or diesel, as internal pump materials and flow rates vary accordingly.
Full price guide
Mercedes E Class Fuel Pump
$29 – $545 · 5,164 listings
Full price guide
Chrysler Voyager Fuel Pump
$45 – $240 · 234 listings
Common questions
Mercedes E Class vs Chrysler Voyager fuel pump FAQ
Is a used Mercedes E Class fuel pump cheaper than a Chrysler Voyager?
Mercedes E Class has the lower median by $36 (22%). The Mercedes E Class fuel pump ranges from $29 to $545 across 5,164 listings, while the Chrysler Voyager ranges from $45 to $240 across 234 listings.
Can I use a Mercedes E Class fuel pump in a Chrysler Voyager?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 5,164 priced Mercedes E Class listings and 234 priced Chrysler Voyager listings — 5,398 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Mercedes E Class $125 vs Chrysler Voyager $163. Grade B (Good): Mercedes E Class $100 vs Chrysler Voyager $170. Grade C (Fair): Mercedes E Class $199 vs Chrysler Voyager $50. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Mercedes E Class fuel pump has 2 trim variants and the Chrysler Voyager has 0. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons