Vehicle price comparison
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Ford Explorer ABS Module prices
Saurabh Kumar
Co-Founder & CTO, Part Price Guide
Built the pricing pipeline that collects and normalizes used OEM part listings from salvage yards and online marketplaces across the US.
Ambika Sharma
Co-Founder & COO, Part Price Guide
12 years of project management and technical operations experience. Reviews price guides for sample size, fitment accuracy, and data freshness.
Price face-off
Median price comparison
Condition comparison
How does the price differ by part grade?
Market analysis
Why does the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ABS module cost more?
A used Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ABS module carries a median asking price of $172, which is 8% higher than the Ford Explorer at $160. Supply also plays a role: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 2,892 priced listings versus 949 for Ford Explorer, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.
Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ford Explorer (2015–2025) but only 7 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2018–2025), so the Ford Explorer data reflects a broader range of generations.
The Ford Explorer ABS module is interchangeable across 12 model years versus just 7 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.
At Grade B (good) condition, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 32% cheaper ($125 vs $185) — the gap widens compared to the overall median difference.
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 13 known trim variants compared to 6 for the Ford Explorer, which means buyers need to be more careful about matching the exact engine or drivetrain configuration on the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.
Buyer's checklist
What to check before buying a used ABS module
- Verify exact part number matching, including suffix letters, as ABS modules are program-coded for specific wheel speed sensors, traction control systems, and brake options.
- Confirm whether the module includes the hydraulic control unit (pump block) or is just the electronic module, as separated units may have exposed solenoid valves prone to moisture damage.
- Ask the seller for donor vehicle VIN verification and whether the unit requires dealer programming or VIN flashing before it will operate on your vehicle.
- Inspect the electrical connector pins for corrosion, bent pins, or melted plastic, which indicates electrical overload or moisture intrusion in the donor vehicle.
Full price guide
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ABS Module
$50 – $565 · 2,892 listings
Full price guide
Ford Explorer ABS Module
$40 – $550 · 949 listings
Common questions
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Ford Explorer ABS module FAQ
Is a used Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ABS module cheaper than a Ford Explorer?
Ford Explorer has the lower median by $12 (8%). The Ford Explorer ABS module ranges from $40 to $550 across 949 listings, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ranges from $50 to $565 across 2,892 listings.
Can I use a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ABS module in a Ford Explorer?
This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.
How many listings does this comparison cover?
This comparison draws from 2,892 priced Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross listings and 949 priced Ford Explorer listings — 3,841 in total.
How does condition grade affect the price?
Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $182 vs Ford Explorer $151. Grade B (Good): Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross $125 vs Ford Explorer $185. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.
Are there different trim variants to choose from?
Yes. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross ABS module has 13 trim variants and the Ford Explorer has 6. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.
More comparisons