Used drive shaft — Ram 1500 vs Lincoln MKZ price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Ram 1500 vs Lincoln MKZ Drive Shaft prices

How do used drive shaft prices compare? Ram 1500 has the lower median by $55 (22%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Ram 1500$190$47 – $77719,763 listingsLower price
VS$55difference
Lincoln MKZ$245$51 – $550385 listings

Median price comparison

Ram 1500$190
Lincoln MKZ$245
Ram 1500MetricLincoln MKZ
$47Low$51
$190Median$245
$777High$550
19,763Listings385

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Ram 1500GradeLincoln MKZ
$19013,339 listings
AExcellent
$250327 listings
$1934,923 listings
BGood
$14747 listings
$126369 listings
CFair
$1251 listings

Market analysis

Why does the Lincoln MKZ drive shaft cost more?

A used Lincoln MKZ drive shaft carries a median asking price of $245, which is 22% higher than the Ram 1500 at $190. Supply also plays a role: Ram 1500 has 19,763 priced listings versus 385 for Lincoln MKZ, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 85% of Lincoln MKZ listings compared to 67% for the Ram 1500, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Lincoln MKZ side.

Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ram 1500 (2015–2025) but only 6 for the Lincoln MKZ (2015–2020), so the Ram 1500 data reflects a broader range of generations.

The Ram 1500 drive shaft is interchangeable across 15 model years versus just 8 for the Lincoln MKZ — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.

At Grade A (excellent) condition, the Ram 1500 is 24% cheaper ($190 vs $250) — the gap narrows compared to the overall median difference.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used drive shaft

  • Measure exact overall length from u-joint center to center, as wheelbase, transmission options, and cab or bed configurations change shaft dimensions dramatically.
  • Inspect slip yoke splines for twisting, excessive wear, or rust pitting, and check universal joint journals for binding or rough movement.
  • Check the tubular shaft body for denting, scraping, or missing balance weights, which cause severe driveline vibration at high speeds.
  • Verify carrier bearing cushion condition on two-piece drive shafts and confirm flange bolt pattern alignment at the differential yoke.

Common questions

Ram 1500 vs Lincoln MKZ drive shaft FAQ

Is a used Ram 1500 drive shaft cheaper than a Lincoln MKZ?

Ram 1500 has the lower median by $55 (22%). The Ram 1500 drive shaft ranges from $47 to $777 across 19,763 listings, while the Lincoln MKZ ranges from $51 to $550 across 385 listings.

Can I use a Ram 1500 drive shaft in a Lincoln MKZ?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 19,763 priced Ram 1500 listings and 385 priced Lincoln MKZ listings — 20,148 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ram 1500 $190 vs Lincoln MKZ $250. Grade B (Good): Ram 1500 $193 vs Lincoln MKZ $147. Grade C (Fair): Ram 1500 $126 vs Lincoln MKZ $125. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Ram 1500 drive shaft has 12 trim variants and the Lincoln MKZ has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other drive shaft matchups

Ram 1500 vs Lincoln MKZ Drive Shaft — $190 vs $245