Used rear view mirror — Ram 3500 vs Cadillac CTS price comparison

Vehicle price comparison

Ram 3500 vs Cadillac CTS Rear View Mirror prices

How do used rear view mirror prices compare? Cadillac CTS has the lower median by $13 (13%). Both figures are part-only asking-price summaries; confirm VIN fitment, condition, warranty, and shipping before buying.
SKWritten bySaurabh Kumar · Co-Founder & CTO
ASReviewed byAmbika Sharma · Co-Founder & COO

Price face-off

Ram 3500$116$30 – $6002,584 listings
VS$13difference
Cadillac CTS$103$40 – $540386 listingsLower price

Median price comparison

Ram 3500$116
Cadillac CTS$103
Ram 3500MetricCadillac CTS
$30Low$40
$116Median$103
$600High$540
2,584Listings386

Condition comparison

How does the price differ by part grade?

Ram 3500GradeCadillac CTS
$1141,419 listings
AExcellent
$101321 listings
$1531,054 listings
BGood
$16552 listings
$7522 listings
CFair
—

Market analysis

Why does the Ram 3500 rear view mirror cost more?

A used Ram 3500 rear view mirror carries a median asking price of $116, which is 13% higher than the Cadillac CTS at $103. Supply also plays a role: Ram 3500 has 2,584 priced listings versus 386 for Cadillac CTS, and more listings generally mean more choices and more competitive pricing.

Grade A (excellent condition) parts make up 83% of Cadillac CTS listings compared to 55% for the Ram 3500, so buyers looking for top-condition units will find more options on the Cadillac CTS side.

The Ram 3500 average ($148) runs 28% above its median ($116), indicating a tail of high-priced listings — likely low-mileage or remanufactured units pulling the average up.

Our guide covers 11 model years for the Ram 3500 (2015–2025) but only 5 for the Cadillac CTS (2015–2019), so the Ram 3500 data reflects a broader range of generations.

The Ram 3500 rear view mirror is interchangeable across 27 model years versus just 13 for the Cadillac CTS — that wider compatibility window means more donor vehicles in salvage yards and tends to push prices lower.

Buyer's checklist

What to check before buying a used rear view mirror

  • Verify mirror feature integration, including auto-dimming electrochromic glass, integrated compass or Homelink garage openers, emergency assistance buttons, and backup camera displays.
  • Check windshield mounting bracket style (wedge mount vs twist-lock button) and trim cover wiring shroud size.
  • Inspect electrochromic glass for discoloration, perimeter bleeding, or liquid crystal separation, which ruins auto-dimming performance.
  • Match wire harness pin count and plug keying to your vehicle's overhead console harness.

Common questions

Ram 3500 vs Cadillac CTS rear view mirror FAQ

Is a used Ram 3500 rear view mirror cheaper than a Cadillac CTS?

Cadillac CTS has the lower median by $13 (13%). The Cadillac CTS rear view mirror ranges from $40 to $540 across 386 listings, while the Ram 3500 ranges from $30 to $600 across 2,584 listings.

Can I use a Ram 3500 rear view mirror in a Cadillac CTS?

This comparison describes pricing, not interchangeability. Even when two parts share similar prices, they may require different engines, trims, electronics, or mounting points. Always match the seller's part number against your VIN before purchasing.

How many listings does this comparison cover?

This comparison draws from 2,584 priced Ram 3500 listings and 386 priced Cadillac CTS listings — 2,970 in total.

How does condition grade affect the price?

Part condition significantly impacts price. Grade A (Excellent): Ram 3500 $114 vs Cadillac CTS $101. Grade B (Good): Ram 3500 $153 vs Cadillac CTS $165. Grade A parts are in excellent condition, B is good, and C is fair — always confirm grading criteria with the seller.

Are there different trim variants to choose from?

Yes. The Ram 3500 rear view mirror has 3 trim variants and the Cadillac CTS has 2. Variants differ by engine size, drivetrain, or part number — matching the right variant is critical for proper fitment.

More comparisons

Other rear view mirror matchups

Ram 3500 vs Cadillac CTS Rear View Mirror — $116 vs $103